The NCAA has decided not to further punish universities in states where the Confederate Flag flies. It considered expanding a rule prohibiting Mississippi and South Carolina from hosting some postseason games, but wisely decided against changing what is already an unreasonable rule.
We've probably reached a point where it is wise for states to consider taking the confederate flag down except when displayed in a historical context. But until universities are given the power to make public policy, the NCAA should stay out of the fight over the Confederate flag. Unfortunately, this will not happen entirely. But the NCAA's refusal to expand its social reach is a wise move and should be applauded.
The battle is not over. As the NCAA becomes increasingly involved in issues unrelated to sports, it is sure to push for the rule change.
Wednesday, January 31, 2007
Tuesday, January 23, 2007
Politically correct NCAA wrong again
The NCAA could broaden its Confederate-flag ban, which prohibits states displaying the "stars and bars" from hosting a scheduled postseason game. This affects mainly NCAA Tournament basketball games. The governing body of college athletics is considering expanding the rule to apply to all postseason games. Under the rule, baseball and football teams in South Carolina and Mississippi -- the two states displaying the Confederate flag -- that earn the right to host playoff games would be punished for something completely out of their control.
Universities in these two states cannot determine what flag flies over the capitol. Any attempt by the NCAA to spread its version of political correctness should be limited to things within the control of its members. It it wrong for the NCAA to punish institutions that refuse to change their American Indian-related nicknames. But at least they have a choice in the matter.
Teams in South Carolina and Mississippi can't easily approach their state Legislatures to lobby for the change in this matter. A better solution would be for the NCAA to wake up and exert its influence in constructive ways – like those that really matter to the athletic and academic development of student-athletes.
Universities in these two states cannot determine what flag flies over the capitol. Any attempt by the NCAA to spread its version of political correctness should be limited to things within the control of its members. It it wrong for the NCAA to punish institutions that refuse to change their American Indian-related nicknames. But at least they have a choice in the matter.
Teams in South Carolina and Mississippi can't easily approach their state Legislatures to lobby for the change in this matter. A better solution would be for the NCAA to wake up and exert its influence in constructive ways – like those that really matter to the athletic and academic development of student-athletes.
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Patterson staying in Fort Worth
TCU coach Gary Patterson reportedly declined a huge offer from Minnesota to coach at the Big Ten school. According to the Fort-Worth Star-Telegram, the deal was worth more than $2 million, roughly double what he is paid at TCU.
Patterson's decision is further confirmation of his high opinion of TCU and Fort Worth. With a long-sought indoor practice facility set to open in the spring TCU continues improve its facilities, giving Patterson and his staff what they need to attract the players necessary to excel in college football. And the administration is taking care of Patterson, who has led the Frogs to consecutive 11-win seasons.
With a record like his, Patterson doesn't have to show loyalty to TCU. He could have left last year for his alma mater, Kansas State, or this year for Minnesota or Miami. But he chose to remain at the place that gave him his start as a head coach -- for now. The suitors will only keep calling as Patterson continues to enhance his credentials. And as the wins pile up, the names will get bigger. He will have the chance to jump to a school more attractive than TCU, one with a legitimate chance of winning a national championship. At Kansas State and Minnesota, that just wasn't going to happen. Miami is a different story, but the program is quickly losing the mystique that made it one of the nation's elite for so many years.
The TCU administration needs to recognize Patterson's value and renegotiate his contract, which runs through 2012. He won't make anywhere near $2 million a year, but the administration owes him at least a substantial boost in pay. Otherwise, he may not say no next time.
Patterson's decision is further confirmation of his high opinion of TCU and Fort Worth. With a long-sought indoor practice facility set to open in the spring TCU continues improve its facilities, giving Patterson and his staff what they need to attract the players necessary to excel in college football. And the administration is taking care of Patterson, who has led the Frogs to consecutive 11-win seasons.
With a record like his, Patterson doesn't have to show loyalty to TCU. He could have left last year for his alma mater, Kansas State, or this year for Minnesota or Miami. But he chose to remain at the place that gave him his start as a head coach -- for now. The suitors will only keep calling as Patterson continues to enhance his credentials. And as the wins pile up, the names will get bigger. He will have the chance to jump to a school more attractive than TCU, one with a legitimate chance of winning a national championship. At Kansas State and Minnesota, that just wasn't going to happen. Miami is a different story, but the program is quickly losing the mystique that made it one of the nation's elite for so many years.
The TCU administration needs to recognize Patterson's value and renegotiate his contract, which runs through 2012. He won't make anywhere near $2 million a year, but the administration owes him at least a substantial boost in pay. Otherwise, he may not say no next time.
Friday, January 12, 2007
Minnesota comes calling
The college football coaching landscape is undergoing major changes, with universities across the spectrum losing or gaining field bosses over the past several weeks. The reason is simple: When one vacancy pops up at a big-time institution, another is created. (Alabama, which lured Nick Saban back to college from the NFL's Miami Dolphins, does not apply here.)
From time to time, TCU's Gary Patterson is courted by the so-called college football elite. His name surfaced as a possibility as the University of Miami this past year and has been linked to a number of institutions with, quite frankly, more to offer than TCU. Frogs fans better prepare to lose him to a tradition-rich national power some day, especially if he keeps piling up 10- and 11-win seasons.
But to the University of Minnesota? Minnesota is hardly what one would call a top-tier member of the Big 10. Much like Texas Tech, another state school in a BCS conference with little chance of consistently making a BCS game, Minnesota hardly seems like a place for a coach with designs on a national championship. Tech and Minnesota can be good, but they are too far from the spotlight to garner much consideration from voters. And the voters, like it or not, determine a team’s chances of landing atop the college football world in January through their preseason polls.
With so many better teams in the Big 10, Minnesota has no more than an academic shot at a national title. (TCU doesn’t even have that.) Hopefully, Patterson will be able to see through what is sure to be a slick sales job and stay at TCU. He has built a consistent winner and emerged from the shadow of former coach Dennis Franchione. Both seemed implausible just a few short years ago. Patterson clearly is not finished proving people wrong.
He would do himself a favor by choosing to continue turning heads in Fort Worth for a while.
From time to time, TCU's Gary Patterson is courted by the so-called college football elite. His name surfaced as a possibility as the University of Miami this past year and has been linked to a number of institutions with, quite frankly, more to offer than TCU. Frogs fans better prepare to lose him to a tradition-rich national power some day, especially if he keeps piling up 10- and 11-win seasons.
But to the University of Minnesota? Minnesota is hardly what one would call a top-tier member of the Big 10. Much like Texas Tech, another state school in a BCS conference with little chance of consistently making a BCS game, Minnesota hardly seems like a place for a coach with designs on a national championship. Tech and Minnesota can be good, but they are too far from the spotlight to garner much consideration from voters. And the voters, like it or not, determine a team’s chances of landing atop the college football world in January through their preseason polls.
With so many better teams in the Big 10, Minnesota has no more than an academic shot at a national title. (TCU doesn’t even have that.) Hopefully, Patterson will be able to see through what is sure to be a slick sales job and stay at TCU. He has built a consistent winner and emerged from the shadow of former coach Dennis Franchione. Both seemed implausible just a few short years ago. Patterson clearly is not finished proving people wrong.
He would do himself a favor by choosing to continue turning heads in Fort Worth for a while.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
University doing good work with banned list
Lake Superior State University has released its annual list of banned words and phrases. Check out the great work from these guardians of the language. It's not perfect, but it provides interesting fodder for conversation, especially for those of us who make a living with words. One with which I whole-heartedly agree is the morphing of celebrity names as a sort of pnuemonic device to help fans remember who's seeing whom.
Just get married already! Then we could dispense with the cute names in favor of Mr. or Mrs. Star of the Week. On second thought, that doesn't work all the time as we've seen from TomKat. And as long as many of those Hollywood marriages have been known to last, it might be a waste of time to learn last names, also. Still, I like the traditional way of identifying couples.
Just get married already! Then we could dispense with the cute names in favor of Mr. or Mrs. Star of the Week. On second thought, that doesn't work all the time as we've seen from TomKat. And as long as many of those Hollywood marriages have been known to last, it might be a waste of time to learn last names, also. Still, I like the traditional way of identifying couples.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
